Climb Global Solutions vs PN Smart Energy
CLMB and PN side by side, both in professional and commercial equipment and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLMB and PN compare
PN Smart Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.0% versus 24.2% for Climb Global Solutions).
Climb Global Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with −4.3% at PN Smart Energy.
Climb Global Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 2 for PN Smart Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLMB | PN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $802M | – |
| Share price | $42.96 | $2.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 59.7% | −82.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 449% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | −1.46 |
| Employees | 412 | 113 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.0× | – |
| P/B | 6.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.9× | – |
| PEG | 1.83 | – |
| Fair value | $24.63 | – |
| Margin of safety | −74.4% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.2% | 27.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.4% (better) | −672% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.2% (better) | −600% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 35.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.5% (better) | 10.0% |
| Operating margin | 4.0% (better) | −4.0% |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | −4.3% |
| FCF margin | – | 3.8% |
| Return on equity | 19.5% (better) | −14.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 35.8% (better) | −18.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.72 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −12.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.14 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.33 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Payout ratio | 3.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.27% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.1% | – |
| Held by insiders | 4.7% | 92.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$609K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 0.60% |
Go deeper
- CLMB stock overview
- CLMB income statement
- CLMB valuation and score
- PN stock overview
- PN income statement
- PN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.