Click vs SU
CLIK and SUGP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLIK and SUGP compare
Click grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (206% versus 5.6% for SU).
Click keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with −9.6% at SU.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLIK | SUGP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.731 | $1.23 |
| Change, 1 year | −88.9% | −99.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.01 | 1.45 |
| Employees | 14 | 437 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | – | 6 |
| Valuation score | – | 0 |
| Growth score | – | 1 |
| Performance score | – | 0 |
| Health score | – | 5 |
| Dividend score | – | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 206% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 133% (better) | −274% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −86.9% (better) | −263% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.0% | 16.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.62% (better) | −10.4% |
| Net margin | 10.8% (better) | −9.6% |
| FCF margin | −4.4% (better) | −8.9% |
| Return on equity | 6.8% (better) | −20.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 0.40% (better) | −29.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 5.05 (better) | 2.82 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.2% | – |
| Held by insiders | 90.3% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $255K | – |
Go deeper
- CLIK stock overview
- CLIK income statement
- CLIK valuation and score
- SUGP stock overview
- SUGP income statement
- SUGP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.