Chatham Lodging Trust vs RLJ Lodging Trust
CLDT and RLJ side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLDT and RLJ compare
RLJ Lodging Trust is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Chatham Lodging Trust ($2.0B against $757M).
On earnings, Chatham Lodging Trust is cheaper: it trades at 102× trailing earnings, against 216× for RLJ Lodging Trust.
RLJ Lodging Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus 3.8% for Chatham Lodging Trust).
Chatham Lodging Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.0% compared with 2.6% at RLJ Lodging Trust.
Both pay dividends: Chatham Lodging Trust yields 2.4% and RLJ Lodging Trust 4.6%.
RLJ Lodging Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Chatham Lodging Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLDT | RLJ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $757M | $2.0B |
| Share price | $16.26 | $12.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 137% | 72.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.5% | −5.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 16 | 75 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 102× (better) | 216× |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | 4.5× (better) |
| PEG | 1.96 | – |
| Fair value | $12.09 | $16.69 |
| Margin of safety | −34.5% | 22.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.8% | 4.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.3% | 23.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 80.6% (better) | 7.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1500% (better) | 20.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 13.4% | – |
| Net margin | 5.0% (better) | 2.6% |
| Return on equity | 2.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 1.6× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.99 (better) | 0.39 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 4.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 121% | 255% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.4% | 71.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.2% (better) | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.3% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.9% | 4.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- CLDT stock overview
- CLDT income statement
- CLDT valuation and score
- RLJ stock overview
- RLJ income statement
- RLJ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.