StockData

Cellebrite DI vs JFrog

CLBT and FROG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CLBT and FROG compare

JFrog grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.8% versus 18.6% for Cellebrite DI).

Cellebrite DI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.5% compared with −3.3% at JFrog.

Cellebrite DI scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for JFrog), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCLBTFROG
Size and price
Market cap–$13.5B
Share price$12.70$109.51
Change, 1 year−18.6%70.3%
Change, 5 years37.1%213%
Beta (5Y)0.931.43
Employees1,0051,800
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)12
Valuation score00
Growth score24 (better)
Performance score6 (better)2
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–21.0×
P/B–13.4×
P/FCF–65.1×
FCF yield–1.5%
Fair value–$33.55
Margin of safety–−226%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)18.6%27.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.5%28.7% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin84.2% (better)78.4%
Operating margin14.0% (better)−7.7%
Net margin16.5% (better)−3.3%
FCF margin33.7% (better)32.3%
Return on equity16.6% (better)−2.3%
Return on invested capital35.4% (better)−23.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.622.15 (better)
Altman Z-score–12.83
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–0.00%
Years of dividend growth–0
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions50.3%93.1%
Held by insiders7.1%10.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$5.4M (better)−$394M
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float2.4%7.0%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.