Clarus vs Johnson Outdoors
CLAR and JOUT side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLAR and JOUT compare
Johnson Outdoors is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Clarus ($501M against $198M).
Johnson Outdoors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus −0.67% for Clarus).
Johnson Outdoors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.2% compared with −10.4% at Clarus.
Both pay dividends: Clarus yields 1.9% and Johnson Outdoors 2.8%.
Johnson Outdoors scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Clarus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLAR | JOUT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $198M | $501M |
| Share price | $5.17 | $47.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.8% | 22.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.7% | −56.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 390 | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.8× |
| FCF yield | −0.44% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.78 | $45.77 |
| Margin of safety | 10.6% (better) | −4.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.67% | 17.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.3% | 39.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −14.6% | 2.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.4% | −1.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.34% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.5% | −1.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −15.5% | 3.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 81.8× |
| Current ratio | 4.08 (better) | 3.37 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.61 | 3.79 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | 2.8% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.24% (better) | 0.02% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.5% | 63.6% |
| Held by insiders | 23.5% | 16.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- CLAR stock overview
- CLAR income statement
- CLAR valuation and score
- JOUT stock overview
- JOUT income statement
- JOUT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.