Clarus vs Escalade
CLAR and ESCA side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLAR and ESCA compare
Escalade is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Clarus ($293M against $203M).
Escalade grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.05% versus −0.67% for Clarus).
Escalade keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.0% compared with −10.4% at Clarus.
Both pay dividends: Clarus yields 1.9% and Escalade 2.9%.
Escalade scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 11 for Clarus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLAR | ESCA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $203M | $293M |
| Share price | $5.29 | $21.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.1% | 73.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.3% | 9.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 390 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.2× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 7.1× |
| FCF yield | −0.43% | 14.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.77 | $27.08 |
| Margin of safety | 8.4% | 21.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.67% | 0.05% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% (better) | −2.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 91.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 92.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −11.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.3% (better) | 28.5% |
| Operating margin | −14.6% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.4% | 10.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.34% | 17.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.5% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −15.5% | 13.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.07 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.31 |
| Interest coverage | – | 44.9× |
| Current ratio | 4.08 (better) | 3.01 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.66 | 5.97 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | 2.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 34.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.24% | 0.75% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | 3.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.5% | 30.7% |
| Held by insiders | 23.5% | 29.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$2.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- CLAR stock overview
- CLAR income statement
- CLAR valuation and score
- ESCA stock overview
- ESCA income statement
- ESCA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.