CitroTech vs SenesTech
CITR and SNES side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CITR and SNES compare
CitroTech is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as SenesTech ($54.7M against $4.8M).
SenesTech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus −26.4% for CitroTech).
SenesTech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −295% compared with −1788% at CitroTech.
SenesTech scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for CitroTech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CITR | SNES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $54.7M | $4.8M |
| Share price | $2.42 | $0.893 |
| Change, 1 year | −72.0% | −74.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.07 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 14 | 23 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 40.5× | 2.0× (better) |
| P/B | 6.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | −14.3% (better) | −139% |
| Fair value | – | $2.20 |
| Margin of safety | – | 59.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −26.4% | 13.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 51.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −0.69% | 66.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1330% | −304% (better) |
| Net margin | −1788% | −295% (better) |
| FCF margin | −579% | −284% (better) |
| Return on equity | −431% | −107% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −446% (better) | −528% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.02 |
| Interest coverage | −25.1× (better) | −360.4× |
| Current ratio | 8.77 (better) | 6.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.49 (better) | −22.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 9.7% | 9.1% |
| Held by insiders | – | 46.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$325K | $1.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- CITR stock overview
- CITR income statement
- CITR valuation and score
- SNES stock overview
- SNES income statement
- SNES valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.