C3is vs United Maritime
CISS and USEA side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CISS and USEA compare
United Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−16.8% versus −17.8% for C3is).
C3is keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.1% compared with −16.4% at United Maritime.
C3is scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 0 for United Maritime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CISS | USEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.78 | $2.46 |
| Change, 1 year | −100.0% | 58.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.42 |
| Employees | – | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −17.8% | −16.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 3.9% (better) | −1.2% |
| Net margin | 30.1% (better) | −16.4% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% (better) | 4.1% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | −11.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% (better) | −0.31% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.32 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.68 (better) | 0.96 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.8% | 6.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 25.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $52.0K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- CISS stock overview
- CISS income statement
- CISS valuation and score
- USEA stock overview
- USEA income statement
- USEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.