C3is vs Pyxis Tankers

CISS and PXS side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

cissC3is$1.80−100.0% in 1 year

pxsPyxis Tankers$5.78+108.7% in 1 year

How CISS and PXS compare

C3is grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−17.8% versus −24.3% for Pyxis Tankers).

C3is keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.1% compared with 5.1% at Pyxis Tankers.

C3is scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Pyxis Tankers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

Metric	CISS	PXS
Size and price
Share price	$1.80	$5.78
Change, 1 year	−100.0%	109%
Change, 5 years	–	113%
Beta (5Y)	0.41	0.29
Employees	–	10
StockData Score
Total score	7 (better)	2
Valuation score	0	0
Growth score	0	0
Performance score	2 (better)	0
Health score	5 (better)	2
Dividend score	0	0
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)	−17.8% (better)	−24.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average	–	12.4%
Net income growth (TTM)	–	−84.5%
EPS growth (TTM)	–	−79.1%
Profitability
Operating margin	3.9%	15.2% (better)
Net margin	30.1% (better)	5.1%
FCF margin	11.0%	–
Return on equity	11.1% (better)	2.1%
Return on invested capital	1.1%	3.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity	0.00	0.83 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA	–	4.23
Interest coverage	–	1.0×
Current ratio	1.68	4.72 (better)
Piotroski F-score	5	5
Ownership
Held by institutions	4.8%	2.3%
Held by insiders	–	58.8%
Short interest, % of float	–	0.70%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.