C3is vs Icon Energy
CISS and ICON side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CISS and ICON compare
Icon Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3786% versus −17.8% for C3is).
C3is keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.1% compared with −251% at Icon Energy.
C3is scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Icon Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CISS | ICON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.80 | $0.905 |
| Change, 1 year | −100.0% | −84.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −99.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −17.8% | 3786% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 3.9% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 30.1% (better) | −251% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% (better) | −316% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | −17.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% (better) | 0.78% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.68 (better) | 1.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.8% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- CISS stock overview
- CISS income statement
- CISS valuation and score
- ICON stock overview
- ICON income statement
- ICON valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.