C3is vs Heidmar Maritime
CISS and HMR side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CISS and HMR compare
Heidmar Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (92.9% versus −17.8% for C3is).
C3is keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.1% compared with −40.4% at Heidmar Maritime.
C3is scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Heidmar Maritime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CISS | HMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.80 | $1.16 |
| Change, 1 year | −100.0% | −3.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | −0.02 |
| Employees | – | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −17.8% | 92.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −1279% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −1400% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 3.9% (better) | −8.7% |
| Net margin | 30.1% (better) | −40.4% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% | 23.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | −156% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.68 (better) | 0.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.8% | 0.33% |
| Held by insiders | – | 45.7% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.06% |
Go deeper
- CISS stock overview
- CISS income statement
- CISS valuation and score
- HMR stock overview
- HMR income statement
- HMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.