C3is vs Globus Maritime
CISS and GLBS side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CISS and GLBS compare
Globus Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus −17.8% for C3is).
C3is scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Globus Maritime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CISS | GLBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.80 | $2.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −100.0% | 143% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 16.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.68 |
| Employees | – | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −17.8% | 26.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 30.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −500% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 3.9% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 30.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 11.0% | 25.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.68 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.68 | 2.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.8% | 3.1% |
| Held by insiders | – | 36.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- CISS stock overview
- CISS income statement
- CISS valuation and score
- GLBS stock overview
- GLBS income statement
- GLBS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.