StockData

CISO Global vs SuperX AI Technology

CISO and SUPX side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CISO and SUPX compare

SuperX AI Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1879% versus −13.9% for CISO Global).

CISO Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −35.8% compared with −528% at SuperX AI Technology.

SuperX AI Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for CISO Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCISOSUPX
Size and price
Market cap$8.5M–
Share price$0.186$5.05
Change, 1 year−81.3%−89.7%
Change, 5 years−99.8%−73.9%
Beta (5Y)0.970.19
Employees14340
StockData Score
Total score57 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4×–
P/B0.9×–
Fair value$0.377–
Margin of safety50.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.9%1879% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average29.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin27.8% (better)−5.4%
Operating margin−33.5% (better)−500%
Net margin−35.8% (better)−528%
FCF margin–−390%
Return on equity−66.1% (better)−102%
Return on invested capital−41.6% (better)−185%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.43 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−15.3×–
Current ratio0.1619.73 (better)
Altman Z-score−13.24–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions5.4%4.3%
Held by insiders46.1%0.51%
Short interest, % of float0.45%2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.