StockData

CISO Global vs Castellum

CISO and CTM side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CISO and CTM compare

Castellum is the larger company, worth 4.9 times as much as CISO Global ($41.6M against $8.5M).

Castellum grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus −13.9% for CISO Global).

Castellum keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.7% compared with −35.8% at CISO Global.

Castellum scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for CISO Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCISOCTM
Size and price
Market cap$8.5M$41.6M
Share price$0.186$0.439
Change, 1 year−81.3%−60.1%
Change, 5 years−99.8%−90.0%
Beta (5Y)0.970.54
Employees143–
StockData Score
Total score511 (better)
Valuation score33
Growth score11
Performance score11
Health score06 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4× (better)0.8×
P/B0.9× (better)1.1×
P/FCF–113×
FCF yield–0.88%
Fair value$0.377$0.667
Margin of safety50.6% (better)34.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.9%9.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average29.7%31.7% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin27.8%34.9% (better)
Operating margin−33.5%−6.8% (better)
Net margin−35.8%−5.7% (better)
FCF margin–0.66%
Return on equity−66.1%−8.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−41.6%−15.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.43 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−15.3×–
Current ratio0.164.94 (better)
Altman Z-score−13.244.01 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions5.4%8.3%
Held by insiders46.1%28.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$307K
Short interest, % of float0.45%8.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.