Circle8 vs Kelly Services
CIRC and KELYA side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CIRC and KELYA compare
Kelly Services is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Circle8 ($576M against $33.3M).
Circle8 grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.5% versus −9.6% for Kelly Services).
Kelly Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.7% compared with −19.4% at Circle8.
Kelly Services pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Circle8 does not pay one.
Kelly Services scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Circle8), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CIRC | KELYA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $33.3M | $576M |
| Share price | $0.291 | $16.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −89.1% | 44.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −19.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 314 | 3,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.1× |
| P/B | – | 0.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 28.1× |
| FCF yield | −69.9% | 3.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $25.06 |
| Margin of safety | – | 33.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 80.5% (better) | −9.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 321% (better) | −1.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.6% | 19.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.8% | −2.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −19.4% | −6.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.9% | 0.50% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −24.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −17.0% | −6.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −4.6× (better) | −10.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 1.50 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.45 | 2.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.1% | 75.5% |
| Held by insiders | 57.4% | 23.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$309K (better) | −$106M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | – |
Go deeper
- CIRC stock overview
- CIRC income statement
- CIRC valuation and score
- KELYA stock overview
- KELYA income statement
- KELYA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.