Circle8 vs Everforth
CIRC and EFOR side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CIRC and EFOR compare
Everforth is the larger company, worth 47 times as much as Circle8 ($1.6B against $33.3M).
Circle8 grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.5% versus −0.95% for Everforth).
Everforth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.1% compared with −19.4% at Circle8.
Everforth scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Circle8), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CIRC | EFOR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $33.3M | $1.6B |
| Share price | $0.291 | $38.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −89.1% | −14.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −70.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 314 | 3,320 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.7× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.4× |
| P/B | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 7.1× |
| FCF yield | −69.9% | 14.1% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $62.76 |
| Margin of safety | – | 39.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 80.5% (better) | −0.95% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 321% (better) | 2.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −40.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −38.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −7.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.6% | 28.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.8% | 4.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −19.4% | 2.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.9% | 5.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 4.6% |
| Return on invested capital | −17.0% | 7.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −4.6× | 2.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 2.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.45 | 2.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 10.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 10.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.1% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 57.4% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$309K | $1.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- CIRC stock overview
- CIRC income statement
- CIRC valuation and score
- EFOR stock overview
- EFOR income statement
- EFOR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.