StockData

Tianci International vs Intrusion

CIIT and INTZ side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CIIT and INTZ compare

Intrusion is the larger company, worth 6.2 times as much as Tianci International ($14.4M against $2.3M).

Tianci International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (53.4% versus −16.4% for Intrusion).

Tianci International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −16.7% compared with −194% at Intrusion.

Tianci International scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 1 for Intrusion), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCIITINTZ
Size and price
Market cap$2.3M$14.4M
Share price$2.16$0.586
Change, 1 year−94.9%−67.3%
Change, 5 years−96.9%−99.2%
Beta (5Y)−0.171.29
Employees1452
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)1
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score11
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2× (better)2.5×
P/B0.4×–
FCF yield–−62.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)53.4% (better)−16.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–1.2%
Profitability
Gross margin7.4%74.1% (better)
Operating margin−17.2% (better)−194%
Net margin−16.7% (better)−194%
FCF margin–−158%
Return on equity−55.0% (better)−95.2%
Return on invested capital−218% (better)−273%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio41.96 (better)0.39
Altman Z-score11.68 (better)−16.75
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.47%5.6%
Held by insiders–17.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$3.4K
Short interest, % of float–1.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.