Energy Co of Minas Gerais vs Southern
CIG and SO side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CIG and SO compare
Energy Co of Minas Gerais grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus 6.4% for Southern).
Southern keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.4% compared with 11.5% at Energy Co of Minas Gerais.
Southern pays a dividend yielding 3.2%; Energy Co of Minas Gerais does not pay one.
Energy Co of Minas Gerais scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Southern), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CIG | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $108B |
| Share price | $1.90 | $93.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.2% | 3.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.9% | 49.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.24 |
| Employees | 5,320 | 30K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.7× |
| P/S | – | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.2× |
| PEG | – | 3.58 |
| FCF yield | – | −3.0% |
| Fair value | – | $82.30 |
| Margin of safety | – | −14.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.4% (better) | 6.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.1% (better) | 7.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.2% | 8.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 7.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.9% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 24.2% |
| Net margin | 11.5% | 15.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.9% (better) | −10.8% |
| Return on equity | 17.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.90 (better) | 5.32 |
| Current ratio | 1.00 (better) | 0.79 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 0.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 66.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | −3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −0.65% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.1% | 72.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.12% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.9K (better) | −$5.9M |
Go deeper
- CIG stock overview
- CIG income statement
- CIG valuation and score
- SO stock overview
- SO income statement
- SO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.