Energy Co of Minas Gerais vs Energy Co of Parana
CIG and ELPC side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CIG and ELPC compare
Energy Co of Parana grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus 7.4% for Energy Co of Minas Gerais).
Energy Co of Minas Gerais scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Energy Co of Parana), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CIG | ELPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.92 | $10.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.4% | 5.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.0% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 5,320 | 4,276 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.4% | 15.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.1% (better) | 7.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.9% | 21.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | −2.4% |
| Net margin | 11.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 7.9% | – |
| Return on equity | 17.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | −2.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.90 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.00 (better) | 0.98 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.1% | 0.70% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.9K (better) | −$760K |
Go deeper
- CIG stock overview
- CIG income statement
- CIG valuation and score
- ELPC stock overview
- ELPC income statement
- ELPC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.