Cipher Digital vs TeraWulf
CIFR and WULF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CIFR and WULF compare
TeraWulf is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Cipher Digital ($5.9B against $3.0B).
Cipher Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.3% versus 14.6% for TeraWulf).
Cipher Digital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −586% compared with −1180% at TeraWulf.
Cipher Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for TeraWulf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CIFR | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $5.9B |
| Share price | $7.29 | $11.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −62.8% | −19.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.8% | −59.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.83 | 2.30 |
| Employees | 66 | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 15.8× (better) | 35.4× |
| P/B | 5.4× (better) | 39.7× |
| FCF yield | −49.3% | −42.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.19 | $1.88 |
| Margin of safety | −128% (better) | −524% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.3% (better) | 14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 65.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.2% (better) | 40.2% |
| Operating margin | −278% | −250% (better) |
| Net margin | −586% (better) | −1180% |
| FCF margin | −780% (better) | −1516% |
| Return on equity | −171% (better) | −1212% |
| Return on invested capital | −13.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 10.03 | – |
| Interest coverage | −3.3× | −2.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.00 (better) | 0.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.24 (better) | −0.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | −3.5% (better) | −20.5% |
| Shareholder yield | −3.5% (better) | −20.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.0% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 31.3% | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$97.1M | −$35.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 26.3% | 30.2% |
Go deeper
- CIFR stock overview
- CIFR income statement
- CIFR valuation and score
- WULF stock overview
- WULF income statement
- WULF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.