Charter Communications vs Rogers Communications
CHTR and RCI side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHTR and RCI compare
Rogers Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.4% versus −1.5% for Charter Communications).
Rogers Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.8% compared with 9.1% at Charter Communications.
Charter Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Rogers Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHTR | RCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3B | – |
| Share price | $111.49 | $32.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.8% | −18.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −83.8% | −31.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.39 |
| Employees | 92K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.2× | – |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 3.1× | – |
| PEG | 0.52 | – |
| FCF yield | 32.8% | – |
| Fair value | $609.40 | – |
| Margin of safety | 81.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 5.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 9.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6.5% | 298% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 298% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.6% | 32.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 45.2% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 45.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.1% | 31.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.0% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 29.7% | 49.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.8% | 15.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.54 | 2.31 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.36 | 2.72 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.36 | 0.61 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.58 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 13.2% |
| Buyback yield | 35.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 35.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.9% | 47.1% |
| Held by insiders | 83.6% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 1 |
Go deeper
- CHTR stock overview
- CHTR income statement
- CHTR valuation and score
- RCI stock overview
- RCI income statement
- RCI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.