Charter Communications vs Optimum Communications
CHTR and OPTU side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHTR and OPTU compare
Charter Communications is the larger company, worth 67 times as much as Optimum Communications ($13.3B against $199M).
Charter Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.5% versus −4.4% for Optimum Communications).
Charter Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.1% compared with −58.1% at Optimum Communications.
Charter Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Optimum Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHTR | OPTU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3B | $199M |
| Share price | $111.49 | $0.730 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.8% | −65.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −83.8% | −96.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 1.19 |
| Employees | 92K | 9,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.2× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 3.1× | – |
| PEG | 0.52 | – |
| FCF yield | 32.8% (better) | −105% |
| Fair value | $609.40 | $4.61 |
| Margin of safety | 81.7% | 84.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% (better) | −4.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% (better) | −2.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 69.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% (better) | −35.3% |
| Net margin | 9.1% (better) | −58.1% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% (better) | −2.5% |
| Return on equity | 29.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.8% (better) | −10.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.54 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.36 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.36 (better) | 0.32 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.58 (better) | −0.51 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 35.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 35.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.9% | 82.0% |
| Held by insiders | 83.6% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.2M | −$3.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
Go deeper
- CHTR stock overview
- CHTR income statement
- CHTR valuation and score
- OPTU stock overview
- OPTU income statement
- OPTU valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.