StockData

ChowChow Cloud International vs WiMi Hologram Cloud

CHOW and WIMI side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CHOW and WIMI compare

ChowChow Cloud International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.2% versus −22.1% for WiMi Hologram Cloud).

WiMi Hologram Cloud keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 73.2% compared with −9.4% at ChowChow Cloud International.

WiMi Hologram Cloud scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for ChowChow Cloud International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCHOWWIMI
Size and price
Share price$3.46$0.494
Change, 1 year−96.3%−84.2%
Change, 5 years–−98.9%
Beta (5Y)–1.24
Employees1786
StockData Score
Total score36 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score03 (better)
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)38.2% (better)−22.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−11.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−298%332% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−292%119% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin12.9%25.8% (better)
Operating margin−9.4%−9.2% (better)
Net margin−9.4%73.2% (better)
FCF margin−22.5%14.0% (better)
Return on equity−57.5%17.3% (better)
Return on invested capital−62.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.070.01 (better)
Interest coverage−162.0×–
Current ratio3.443.56 (better)
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions–3.6%
Held by insiders0.00%16.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.