ChowChow Cloud International vs GCL Global
CHOW and GCL side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHOW and GCL compare
GCL Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (68.2% versus 38.2% for ChowChow Cloud International).
ChowChow Cloud International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9.4% compared with −10.5% at GCL Global.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHOW | GCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $3.46 | $1.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −96.3% | −28.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.04 |
| Employees | 17 | 147 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 38.2% | 68.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −298% (better) | −547% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −292% (better) | −500% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.9% (better) | 10.3% |
| Operating margin | −9.4% | −5.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.4% (better) | −10.5% |
| FCF margin | −22.5% | −4.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −57.5% (better) | −68.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −62.5% | −18.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 (better) | 2.06 |
| Interest coverage | −162.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.44 (better) | 1.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 65.7% |
Go deeper
- CHOW stock overview
- CHOW income statement
- CHOW valuation and score
- GCL stock overview
- GCL income statement
- GCL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.