Check Point Software Technologies vs Gen Digital
CHKP and GEN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHKP and GEN compare
Gen Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.9% versus 6.3% for Check Point Software Technologies).
Check Point Software Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.8% compared with 23.1% at Gen Digital.
Gen Digital pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Check Point Software Technologies does not pay one.
Gen Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 12 for Check Point Software Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHKP | GEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $17.4B |
| Share price | $152.11 | $29.13 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.9% | 12.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 30.4% | 17.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.50 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 3,066 | 3,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.6× |
| P/S | – | 3.3× |
| P/B | – | 6.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.1% |
| Fair value | – | $46.74 |
| Margin of safety | – | 37.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 16.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 14.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.0% | 112% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.0% | 116% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 86.7% (better) | 77.4% |
| Operating margin | 30.5% | 41.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 38.8% (better) | 23.1% |
| FCF margin | 43.0% (better) | 33.7% |
| Return on equity | 37.3% | 46.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 14.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 2.96 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.88 |
| Current ratio | 2.05 (better) | 0.37 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.9% | 92.4% |
| Held by insiders | 25.4% | 10.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.2M (better) | −$21.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | – |
Go deeper
- CHKP stock overview
- CHKP income statement
- CHKP valuation and score
- GEN stock overview
- GEN income statement
- GEN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.