Choice Hotels International vs Xenia Hotels & Resorts
CHH and XHR side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHH and XHR compare
Choice Hotels International is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Xenia Hotels & Resorts ($5.0B against $1.9B).
Choice Hotels International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.6% versus 1.6% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts).
Choice Hotels International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.3% compared with −0.66% at Xenia Hotels & Resorts.
Both pay dividends: Choice Hotels International yields 1.0% and Xenia Hotels & Resorts 2.7%.
Choice Hotels International scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Xenia Hotels & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHH | XHR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.0B | $1.9B |
| Share price | $111.16 | $20.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.0% | 59.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.3% | 1.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 1,700 | 42 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.7× | – |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 35.2× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | 9.1× (better) |
| PEG | 1.62 | – |
| Fair value | $108.86 | $18.85 |
| Margin of safety | −2.1% (better) | −8.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% (better) | 1.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | 23.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.7% (better) | −111% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.9% (better) | −113% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 42.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 30.8% |
| Operating margin | 25.2% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net margin | 20.3% (better) | −0.66% |
| Return on equity | 566% (better) | −0.62% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.9% (better) | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 14.08 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.13 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× (better) | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.93 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 3.15 (better) | 0.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 2.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 16.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.3% |
| Buyback yield | 2.7% (better) | 2.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.6% | 95.5% |
| Held by insiders | 17.1% | 0.73% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.6M (better) | −$5.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.8% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- CHH stock overview
- CHH income statement
- CHH valuation and score
- XHR stock overview
- XHR income statement
- XHR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.