Choice Hotels International vs Park Hotels & Resorts
CHH and PK side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHH and PK compare
Choice Hotels International is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Park Hotels & Resorts ($5.3B against $3.3B).
Choice Hotels International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.1% versus −0.16% for Park Hotels & Resorts).
Choice Hotels International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.7% compared with −6.5% at Park Hotels & Resorts.
Both pay dividends: Choice Hotels International yields 0.97% and Park Hotels & Resorts 6.2%.
Choice Hotels International scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Park Hotels & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHH | PK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $3.3B |
| Share price | $118.78 | $16.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.5% | 50.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.8% | −14.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 1,700 | 90 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.4× | – |
| P/S | 3.3× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 40.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.7× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 30.1× |
| PEG | 2.73 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $88.35 | $13.21 |
| Margin of safety | −34.4% | −22.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% (better) | −0.16% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | 24.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −46.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 42.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 22.8% (better) | 1.2% |
| Net margin | 12.7% (better) | −6.5% |
| FCF margin | – | 4.3% |
| Return on equity | 147% (better) | −5.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.7% (better) | 0.84% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 16.52 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.57 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.8× (better) | 0.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 3.10 (better) | 0.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 6.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 25.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 17.3% |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.6% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 17.1% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.0M | $33.0K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.7% | 14.1% |
Go deeper
- CHH stock overview
- CHH income statement
- CHH valuation and score
- PK stock overview
- PK income statement
- PK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.