Chegg vs Jinxin Technology
CHGG and NAMI side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHGG and NAMI compare
Jinxin Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.6% versus −47.6% for Chegg).
Chegg keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −20.0% compared with −22.8% at Jinxin Technology.
Chegg scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Jinxin Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHGG | NAMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $63.9M | – |
| Share price | $0.575 | $1.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −52.5% | −91.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | −0.18 |
| Employees | 595 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× | – |
| P/B | 0.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −10.9% | – |
| Fair value | $3.28 | – |
| Margin of safety | 82.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −47.6% | 1.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −10.2% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −565% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −275% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.0% (better) | 11.0% |
| Operating margin | −20.9% (better) | −25.2% |
| Net margin | −20.0% (better) | −22.8% |
| FCF margin | −2.6% (better) | −6.1% |
| Return on equity | −38.3% (better) | −95.5% |
| Return on invested capital | −74.1% (better) | −266% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.13 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −411.9× (better) | −3257.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 1.50 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −5.33 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.4% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 17.2% | 59.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $4.4K (better) | −$145K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | – |
Go deeper
- CHGG stock overview
- CHGG income statement
- CHGG valuation and score
- NAMI stock overview
- NAMI income statement
- NAMI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.