Church & Dwight vs Coty
CHD and COTY side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHD and COTY compare
Church & Dwight is the larger company, worth 8.5 times as much as Coty ($25.4B against $3.0B).
Church & Dwight grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.7% versus −1.5% for Coty).
Church & Dwight keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.4% compared with −10.4% at Coty.
Church & Dwight pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Coty does not pay one.
Church & Dwight scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 4 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHD | COTY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $25.4B | $3.0B |
| Share price | $107.23 | $3.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.0% | −13.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.8% | −63.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 5,550 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.0× | – |
| P/S | 4.1× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 5.7× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.2× | 15.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 24.0× | 8.6× (better) |
| PEG | 1.53 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 11.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $85.55 | $4.42 |
| Margin of safety | −25.3% | 23.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% (better) | −1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% (better) | 4.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −0.98% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.65% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.1% | 62.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 18.0% (better) | −1.4% |
| Net margin | 12.4% (better) | −10.4% |
| FCF margin | 16.9% (better) | 6.0% |
| Return on equity | 17.8% (better) | −18.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.3% (better) | −0.98% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.49 (better) | 1.02 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.56 (better) | 7.17 |
| Interest coverage | 11.6× (better) | −0.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.96 (better) | 0.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.28 (better) | −0.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 37.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.3% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.12% | 61.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.1M | $213K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 12.0% |
Go deeper
- CHD stock overview
- CHD income statement
- CHD valuation and score
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.