Core AI vs SurgePays
CHAI and SURG side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHAI and SURG compare
Core AI scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 1 for SurgePays), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHAI | SURG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.5M |
| Share price | $0.177 | $0.141 |
| Change, 1 year | −95.2% | −94.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −100% | −93.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 42 | 30 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.1× |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.3% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 55.9% (better) | 0.92% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −5.5% (better) | −19.6% |
| Operating margin | −8.0% (better) | −41.0% |
| Net margin | – | −47.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −15.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.08 (better) | 0.19 |
| Altman Z-score | – | −21.51 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.1% | 4.4% |
| Held by insiders | 8.2% | 9.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $83.0K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- CHAI stock overview
- CHAI income statement
- CHAI valuation and score
- SURG stock overview
- SURG income statement
- SURG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.