StockData

Creative Global Technology vs PN Smart Energy

CGTL and PN side by side, both in professional and commercial equipment and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CGTL and PN compare

PN Smart Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.0% versus −40.6% for Creative Global Technology).

PN Smart Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.3% compared with −63.2% at Creative Global Technology.

Creative Global Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for PN Smart Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCGTLPN
Size and price
Share price$2.49$2.31
Change, 1 year−73.9%−82.7%
Beta (5Y)−0.47−1.46
Employees12113
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−40.6%27.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−412% (better)−672%
EPS growth (TTM)−371% (better)−600%
Profitability
Gross margin10.8% (better)10.0%
Operating margin−62.2%−4.0% (better)
Net margin−63.2%−4.3% (better)
FCF margin–3.8%
Return on equity−96.5%−14.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−77.7%−18.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−12.3×
Current ratio46.70 (better)1.59
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.10%–
Held by insiders0.00%92.7%
Short interest, % of float0.02%0.60%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.