StockData

Creative Global Technology vs INNO

CGTL and INHD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CGTL and INHD compare

INNO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (146% versus −40.6% for Creative Global Technology).

Creative Global Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −63.2% compared with −72.7% at INNO.

INNO scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Creative Global Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCGTLINHD
Size and price
Market cap–$6.7M
Share price$2.49$2.65
Change, 1 year−73.9%−99.5%
Beta (5Y)−0.470.48
Employees124
StockData Score
Total score56 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.2×
P/B–0.1×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−40.6%146% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−412%–
EPS growth (TTM)−371%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.8% (better)3.7%
Operating margin−62.2% (better)−67.9%
Net margin−63.2% (better)−72.7%
Return on equity−96.5%−7.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−77.7%−13.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00 (better)
Current ratio46.70137.23 (better)
Altman Z-score–9.68
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−693%
Shareholder yield–−693%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.10%1.6%
Held by insiders0.00%–
Short interest, % of float0.02%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.