StockData

Compugen vs Ginkgo Bioworks

CGEN and DNA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CGEN and DNA compare

Compugen grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (161% versus −13.2% for Ginkgo Bioworks).

Compugen keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 48.6% compared with −192% at Ginkgo Bioworks.

Compugen scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Ginkgo Bioworks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCGENDNA
Size and price
Market cap–$647M
Share price$2.10$9.61
Change, 1 year25.0%15.0%
Change, 5 years−55.4%−98.2%
Beta (5Y)1.612.73
Employees2485
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)9
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–4.9×
P/B–1.6×
FCF yield–−26.8%
Fair value–$9.67
Margin of safety–0.61%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)161% (better)−13.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average105% (better)17.3%
Profitability
Gross margin87.3%–
Operating margin43.1% (better)−205%
Net margin48.6% (better)−192%
FCF margin43.1% (better)−133%
Return on equity50.9% (better)−52.7%
Return on invested capital117% (better)−113%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio5.72 (better)4.72
Altman Z-score–−9.15
Piotroski F-score7 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–53.7%
Held by insiders0.43%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$126K (better)−$5.0M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float2.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.