StockData

Canopy Growth vs Glass House Brands

CGC and GLAS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CGC and GLAS compare

Canopy Growth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus −9.4% for Glass House Brands).

Glass House Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −16.3% compared with −87.0% at Canopy Growth.

Glass House Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Canopy Growth), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCGCGLAS
Size and price
Share price$0.561$1.27
Change, 1 year−52.8%−83.1%
Change, 5 years−99.5%−72.1%
Beta (5Y)1.890.67
Employees1,128472
StockData Score
Total score35 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score13 (better)
Health score11
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.7% (better)−9.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−12.2%30.4% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−5815%
Profitability
Gross margin24.4%42.3% (better)
Operating margin−54.2%−9.1% (better)
Net margin−87.0%−16.3% (better)
FCF margin−25.8%−8.6% (better)
Return on equity–−31.2%
Return on invested capital–−9.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.93
Interest coverage−3.7×−2.3× (better)
Current ratio2.82 (better)1.78
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Ownership
Held by institutions6.9%24.9%
Held by insiders1.0%0.04%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$393K−$354K (better)
Short interest, % of float–0.82%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.