Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust vs Transcontinental Realty Investors
CFTR.PA and TCI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CFTR.PA and TCI compare
Transcontinental Realty Investors is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust ($438M against $269M).
On earnings, Transcontinental Realty Investors is cheaper: it trades at 53.1× trailing earnings, against 317× for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust.
Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.7% versus 5.3% for Transcontinental Realty Investors).
Transcontinental Realty Investors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.1% compared with 0.46% at Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust.
Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust pays a dividend yielding 5.3%; Transcontinental Realty Investors does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CFTR.PA | TCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $269M | $438M |
| Share price | $25.36 | $49.93 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 29.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.17 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 317× | 53.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 8.7× |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 77.1× |
| Fair value | $22.42 | $31.98 |
| Margin of safety | −13.1% (better) | −56.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% (better) | 5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.2% (better) | −3.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 22.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 23.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −18.3% |
| Net margin | 0.46% | 16.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.25% | 0.96% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −0.96% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | −1.0× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.17 | 1.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 2198% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 17.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 3.8% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 85.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $11.8M (better) | $7.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- CFTR.PA stock overview
- CFTR.PA income statement
- CFTR.PA valuation and score
- TCI stock overview
- TCI income statement
- TCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.