Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust vs Alpine Income Property Trust
CFTR.PA and PINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CFTR.PA and PINE compare
Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust and Alpine Income Property Trust are about the same size, with market caps of $269M and $289M.
On earnings, Alpine Income Property Trust is cheaper: it trades at 86.3× trailing earnings, against 317× for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust.
Alpine Income Property Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus 5.7% for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust).
Alpine Income Property Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 0.46% at Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust.
Both pay dividends: Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust yields 5.3% and Alpine Income Property Trust 7.4%.
Alpine Income Property Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CFTR.PA | PINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $269M | $289M |
| Share price | $25.36 | $16.39 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 13.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −12.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.44 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 317× | 86.3× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 4.1× |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.0× |
| Fair value | $22.42 | $17.14 |
| Margin of safety | −13.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 24.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.2% (better) | 25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 33.9% |
| Net margin | 0.46% | 9.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.25% | 2.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.17 | 0.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.3% | 7.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 2198% | 303% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.8% |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 17.3% (better) | 7.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 60.4% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 7.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $11.8M (better) | −$261K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- CFTR.PA stock overview
- CFTR.PA income statement
- CFTR.PA valuation and score
- PINE stock overview
- PINE income statement
- PINE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.