StockData

Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust vs Gladstone Land

CFTR.PA and LAND side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CFTR.PA and LAND compare

Gladstone Land is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust ($320M against $269M).

Gladstone Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.6% versus 5.7% for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust).

Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.46% compared with −7.3% at Gladstone Land.

Both pay dividends: Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust yields 5.3% and Gladstone Land 7.6%.

Gladstone Land scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCFTR.PALAND
Size and price
Market cap$269M$320M
Share price$25.36$7.41
Change, 1 year–−18.7%
Change, 5 years–−71.1%
Beta (5Y)–0.91
Employees–75
StockData Score
Total score68 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score11
Health score00
Dividend score33
Valuation
P/E317×–
P/S2.7× (better)3.6×
P/B1.6×0.5× (better)
Fair value$22.42$9.63
Margin of safety−13.1%23.1% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.7%21.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average44.2% (better)9.1%
Net income growth (TTM)–−183%
Profitability
Net margin0.46% (better)−7.3%
Return on equity0.25% (better)−0.96%
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.170.44 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield5.3%7.6% (better)
Payout ratio2198%–
Buyback yield12.1%–
Shareholder yield17.3% (better)7.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%40.5%
Held by insiders7.1%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$11.8M–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.