Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust vs CTO Realty Growth
CFTR.PA and CTO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CFTR.PA and CTO compare
CTO Realty Growth is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust ($739M against $269M).
On earnings, CTO Realty Growth is cheaper: it trades at 14.5× trailing earnings, against 317× for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust.
CTO Realty Growth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.3% versus 5.7% for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust).
CTO Realty Growth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.6% compared with 0.46% at Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust.
Both pay dividends: Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust yields 5.3% and CTO Realty Growth 7.7%.
CTO Realty Growth scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CFTR.PA | CTO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $269M | $739M |
| Share price | $25.36 | $19.71 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 19.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 4.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.57 |
| Employees | – | 42 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 317× | 14.5× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 4.6× |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.9× |
| Fair value | $22.42 | $30.67 |
| Margin of safety | −13.1% | 35.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 14.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.2% (better) | 21.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −57.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 75.1% |
| Operating margin | – | 38.7% |
| Net margin | 0.46% | 32.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.25% | 8.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.17 | 1.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.3% | 7.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 2198% | 97.2% |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 17.3% (better) | 7.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 66.7% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $11.8M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- CFTR.PA stock overview
- CFTR.PA income statement
- CFTR.PA valuation and score
- CTO stock overview
- CTO income statement
- CTO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.