CF Industries vs CVR Partners, LP
CF and UAN side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CF and UAN compare
CF Industries is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as CVR Partners, LP ($18.7B against $1.3B).
On earnings, CVR Partners, LP is cheaper: it trades at 8.4× trailing earnings, against 9.1× for CF Industries.
CF Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus 17.5% for CVR Partners, LP).
Both pay dividends: CF Industries yields 1.7% and CVR Partners, LP 11.4%.
CF Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for CVR Partners, LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CF | UAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $18.7B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $123.30 | $126.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.5% | 38.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 108% | 58.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.14 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 2,900 | 320 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.1× | 8.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 2.0× (better) |
| P/B | 3.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0× (better) | 6.4× |
| P/FCF | 9.8× | 9.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 10.2% | 10.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $221.20 | $228.76 |
| Margin of safety | 44.3% | 44.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.0% (better) | 17.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% | 11.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 82.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 76.1% | 82.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 43.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.5% (better) | 33.5% |
| Operating margin | 41.1% (better) | 28.1% |
| Net margin | – | 23.7% |
| FCF margin | 24.7% (better) | 21.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 35.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.56 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.63 (better) | 1.57 |
| Interest coverage | 18.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.86 (better) | 3.01 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.70 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 11.4% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% | 11.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.59% | 78.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.6% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- CF stock overview
- CF income statement
- CF valuation and score
- UAN stock overview
- UAN income statement
- UAN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.