StockData

CEVA vs Sangoma Technologies

CEVA and SANG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CEVA and SANG compare

CEVA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus −15.5% for Sangoma Technologies).

CEVA scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Sangoma Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCEVASANG
Size and price
Market cap$758M–
Share price$26.94$4.70
Change, 1 year3.6%−5.2%
Change, 5 years−44.1%−76.0%
Beta (5Y)1.781.38
Employees30–
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)4
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score6 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S6.5×–
P/B2.2×–
P/FCF134×–
FCF yield0.75%–
Fair value$25.69–
Margin of safety−4.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.3% (better)−15.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.8%8.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin86.8% (better)70.3%
Operating margin−9.5%–
Net margin−9.2%–
FCF margin4.9%11.0% (better)
Return on equity−3.5%–
Return on invested capital−7.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.16 (better)
Current ratio10.88 (better)0.78
Altman Z-score10.39–
Piotroski F-score4–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions89.6%23.4%
Held by insiders4.4%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$174K–
Short interest, % of float10.1%0.77%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.