StockData

CEVA vs MicroCloud Hologram

CEVA and HOLO side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CEVA and HOLO compare

MicroCloud Hologram grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.6% versus 8.3% for CEVA).

CEVA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9.2% compared with −12.4% at MicroCloud Hologram.

CEVA scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for MicroCloud Hologram), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCEVAHOLO
Size and price
Market cap$758M–
Share price$26.94$1.21
Change, 1 year3.6%−67.0%
Change, 5 years−44.1%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)1.781.75
Employees3074
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)7
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score11
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S6.5×–
P/B2.2×–
P/FCF134×–
FCF yield0.75%–
Fair value$25.69–
Margin of safety−4.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.3%38.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin86.8% (better)21.3%
Operating margin−9.5%0.65% (better)
Net margin−9.2% (better)−12.4%
FCF margin4.9%13.9% (better)
Return on equity−3.5%−1.8% (better)
Return on invested capital−7.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio10.8834.60 (better)
Altman Z-score10.39–
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions89.6%–
Held by insiders4.4%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$174K–
Short interest, % of float10.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.