StockData

Cerus vs MiMedx

CERS and MDXG side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CERS and MDXG compare

Cerus and MiMedx are about the same size, with market caps of $427M and $484M.

Cerus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.9% compared with −6.3% at MiMedx.

MiMedx scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Cerus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCERSMDXG
Size and price
Market cap$427M$484M
Share price$2.12$3.32
Change, 1 year32.5%−56.9%
Change, 5 years−70.6%−57.1%
Beta (5Y)1.720.98
Employees275808
StockData Score
Total score612 (better)
Valuation score23 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.7×1.6× (better)
P/B5.6×2.3× (better)
P/FCF865×–
FCF yield0.12%–
Fair value$2.72$4.92
Margin of safety22.1%32.5% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–−22.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.4% (better)11.0%
Net income growth (TTM)–−147%
EPS growth (TTM)–−148%
Profitability
Gross margin–77.3%
Operating margin−0.97% (better)−8.3%
Net margin−2.9% (better)−6.3%
FCF margin0.19%–
Return on equity−10.7%−8.5% (better)
Return on invested capital−966%−19.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−0.4×–
Current ratio1.964.35 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.786.52 (better)
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.01%–
Shareholder yield0.01% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions74.8%79.9%
Held by insiders6.0%2.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$3.2M$0 (better)
Short interest, % of float7.7%6.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.