StockData

Capstone Energy Plus vs OMS Energy Technologies

CEPL and OMSE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CEPL and OMSE compare

Capstone Energy Plus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.4% versus −23.4% for OMS Energy Technologies).

OMS Energy Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 3.5% at Capstone Energy Plus.

OMS Energy Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Capstone Energy Plus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCEPLOMSE
Size and price
Market cap$87.6M–
Share price$2.66$3.86
Change, 1 year−10.7%−22.8%
Beta (5Y)−0.490.23
Employees115616
StockData Score
Total score56 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score13 (better)
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
EV/EBITDA9.0×–
P/FCF30.5×–
FCF yield3.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.4% (better)−23.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average9.4%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−28.1%
EPS growth (TTM)–−34.7%
Profitability
Gross margin34.0% (better)30.3%
Operating margin4.4%22.4% (better)
Net margin3.5%20.7% (better)
FCF margin2.8%34.0% (better)
Return on equity–20.2%
Return on invested capital–65.7%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA−0.69–
Interest coverage1.1×86.3× (better)
Current ratio1.006.65 (better)
Altman Z-score−10.23–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions0.30%0.70%
Held by insiders62.4%64.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$0–
Short interest, % of float12.8%0.02%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.