StockData

Creative Medical Technology vs Senti Biosciences

CELZ and SNTI side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CELZ and SNTI compare

Senti Biosciences is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Creative Medical Technology ($4.9M against $4.2M).

Creative Medical Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Senti Biosciences), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCELZSNTI
Size and price
Market cap$4.2M$4.9M
Share price$0.630$0.157
Change, 1 year−80.8%−91.9%
Change, 5 years−98.2%−99.8%
Beta (5Y)1.561.86
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1384×–
P/B0.6×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−50.0%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average−48.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin66.9%–
Operating margin−256435%–
Net margin−249160%–
Return on equity−119% (better)−466%
Return on invested capital−3737%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio23.66 (better)0.83
Altman Z-score−8.55 (better)−21.35
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−190%–
Shareholder yield−190%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions5.7%18.6%
Held by insiders15.9%–
Short interest, % of float1.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.