CECO Environmental vs Fuel Tech
CECO and FTEK side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CECO and FTEK compare
CECO Environmental is the larger company, worth 80 times as much as Fuel Tech ($3.3B against $40.9M).
CECO Environmental grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (54.5% versus 8.9% for Fuel Tech).
CECO Environmental keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.1% compared with −12.8% at Fuel Tech.
CECO Environmental scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Fuel Tech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CECO | FTEK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $40.9M |
| Share price | $56.00 | $1.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.1% | −33.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 752% | −32.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 1,540 | 77 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 3.0× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 87.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 28.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.5% (better) | −2.9% |
| Fair value | $3.76 | $2.07 |
| Margin of safety | −1388% | 36.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 54.5% (better) | 8.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −166% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −154% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 42.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 44.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.38% (better) | −16.8% |
| Net margin | −3.1% (better) | −12.8% |
| FCF margin | 10.4% (better) | −4.3% |
| Return on equity | −2.9% (better) | −8.9% |
| Return on invested capital | −0.22% (better) | −20.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.29 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 12.15 | – |
| Interest coverage | −0.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.29 | 5.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.59 (better) | 1.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.11% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.11% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.0% | 23.6% |
| Held by insiders | 9.4% | 10.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.7M | $14.4K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 0.19% |
Go deeper
- CECO stock overview
- CECO income statement
- CECO valuation and score
- FTEK stock overview
- FTEK income statement
- FTEK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.