StockData

COPT Defense Properties vs JBG SMITH Properties

CDP and JBGS side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CDP and JBGS compare

COPT Defense Properties is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as JBG SMITH Properties ($3.8B against $886M).

COPT Defense Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus −1.1% for JBG SMITH Properties).

Both pay dividends: COPT Defense Properties yields 3.8% and JBG SMITH Properties 5.9%.

JBG SMITH Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for COPT Defense Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCDPJBGS
Size and price
Market cap$3.8B$886M
Share price$33.35$11.88
Change, 1 year21.3%−41.0%
Change, 5 years17.3%−60.7%
Beta (5Y)0.450.74
Employees394596
StockData Score
Total score67 (better)
Valuation score34 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score00
Dividend score23 (better)
Valuation
P/E23.2×–
P/S4.8×1.7× (better)
P/B2.5×0.8× (better)
EV/EBITDA8.8×5.8× (better)
Fair value$34.15$17.03
Margin of safety2.4%30.2% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.5% (better)−1.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average5.6% (better)−3.7%
EPS growth (TTM)12.5%–
EPS growth, 5Y average9.0%–
Profitability
Net margin–−29.9%
Return on equity–−14.2%
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.95 (better)−0.10
Piotroski F-score–5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield3.8%5.9% (better)
Years of dividend growth3 (better)0
Dividend growth, 5Y average2.1% (better)−4.9%
Buyback yield–11.2%
Shareholder yield3.8%17.1% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions113%76.4%
Held by insiders0.31%0.52%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.3M−$477K (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float7.6%17.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.