Cardlytics vs Viant Technology
CDLX and DSP side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CDLX and DSP compare
Viant Technology is the larger company, worth 82 times as much as Cardlytics ($796M against $9.7M).
Viant Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.5% versus −25.3% for Cardlytics).
Viant Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.9% compared with −20.8% at Cardlytics.
Viant Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Cardlytics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CDLX | DSP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.7M | $796M |
| Share price | $1.65 | $11.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −88.5% | 37.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | 7.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.50 | 1.43 |
| Employees | 275 | 380 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | – | 6.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 28.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.8× |
| FCF yield | −74.1% | 8.5% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $8.71 |
| Margin of safety | – | −37.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −25.3% | 27.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.5% | 15.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 321% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −55.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 44.7% |
| Operating margin | −19.2% | 1.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.8% | 1.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.1% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 11.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −6.39 |
| Current ratio | 1.82 | 2.20 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −8.24 | 3.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.6% | 18.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$406K (better) | −$9.5M |
Go deeper
- CDLX stock overview
- CDLX income statement
- CDLX valuation and score
- DSP stock overview
- DSP income statement
- DSP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.