United Breweries vs Mexican Economic Development
CCU and FMX side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCU and FMX compare
Mexican Economic Development grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus 0.17% for United Breweries).
Mexican Economic Development scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for United Breweries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCU | FMX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $10.33 | $126.10 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.1% | 33.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.2% | 55.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 88K | 90K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.17% | 7.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 11.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.4% (better) | 40.6% |
| Operating margin | 6.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 3.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 21.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.60 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.34 |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.90 (better) | 1.35 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.6% | 0.45% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 8.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$4.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
Go deeper
- CCU stock overview
- CCU income statement
- CCU valuation and score
- FMX stock overview
- FMX income statement
- FMX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.