StockData

CCSC Technology International vs Intelligent Living Application

CCTG and ILAG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CCTG and ILAG compare

CCSC Technology International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.9% versus −40.1% for Intelligent Living Application).

CCSC Technology International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −27.8% compared with −431% at Intelligent Living Application.

CCSC Technology International scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Intelligent Living Application), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCCTGILAG
Size and price
Share price$0.326$1.75
Change, 1 year−91.4%−65.3%
Beta (5Y)1.640.14
Employees18198
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.9% (better)−40.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−16.7%
Profitability
Gross margin29.3% (better)2.9%
Operating margin−20.0% (better)−431%
Net margin−27.8% (better)−431%
FCF margin−31.0% (better)−54.6%
Return on equity−41.0% (better)−221%
Return on invested capital−34.9% (better)−174%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.32 (better)
Interest coverage−157.5× (better)−412.5×
Current ratio2.09 (better)1.97
Piotroski F-score4 (better)1
Ownership
Held by institutions–1.5%
Held by insiders12.8%69.5%
Short interest, % of float3.6%0.67%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.