CCSC Technology International vs Energys
CCTG and ENGS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCTG and ENGS compare
CCSC Technology International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.9% versus −28.2% for Energys).
CCSC Technology International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −27.8% compared with −30.1% at Energys.
CCSC Technology International scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Energys), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCTG | ENGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.326 | $0.364 |
| Change, 1 year | −91.4% | −72.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.64 | 1.34 |
| Employees | 18 | 38 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.9% (better) | −28.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.3% (better) | 20.4% |
| Operating margin | −20.0% (better) | −25.2% |
| Net margin | −27.8% (better) | −30.1% |
| FCF margin | −31.0% | −7.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −41.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −34.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −157.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.09 (better) | 0.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 12.8% | 75.8% |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | – |
Go deeper
- CCTG stock overview
- CCTG income statement
- CCTG valuation and score
- ENGS stock overview
- ENGS income statement
- ENGS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.